Google's New Canonical Option

 

Google released on its official blog the other day that it now has provided webmasters with a way to avoid duplicated content issues. They now will allow you to tell them which version of the content you want them to accept. A quick note that should be mentioned here is that Yahoo and Live have implemented this as well.

Now you might be wondering where this would actually benefit yourselves from an SEO standpoint. The following is a simple example:

index.php?color=blue
index.php?color=red

With the above 2 urls all we are changing is the color scheme of the website using the php $_GET variables. The problem comes because both of the above urls will have the same title tag, and content. To Google this is a great example of duplicate content.

Now using this handy new option from Google; we could simply add the following to the head of our HTML document to avoid the duplicate content:

<link rel="canonical" href="index.php" />

Now Google will know that index.php is the file with the content, and will not penalize you for any duplicate content.

This theory is relatively new, and thus it will be changing frequently as people try and get the upper hand. Some people are even suggesting that the tag may eventually become as useless as the meta keyword tag currently is.

Personally I still think avoiding duplicate content without using this tag is preferable, but if you have no choice take a look at it.

Further resources to expand your knowledge on this topic:

Share and Enjoy:
  • Print
  • Digg
  • Sphinn
  • del.icio.us
  • Facebook
  • Mixx
  • Google Bookmarks
  • Add to favorites
  • Design Float
  • DZone
  • email
  • FriendFeed
  • PDF
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Twitter

Related posts:

  1. Search Engine Positioning
  2. SEO Theory 101: Tips, Tricks, and Tools


Written by Brenley Dueck

 

4 Responses to “Google's New Canonical Option”

  1. Brian Cray Says:

    February 14th, 2009 at 10:37 pm

    Great dig up on this! There are so many Web sites suffering from diluted page ranks due to this. I usually handle this kind of stuff with .htaccess hacks :)

  2. James Says:

    February 15th, 2009 at 5:58 pm

    Thanks for the info Brenelz. I agree with you on the fact it’s best to avoid duplicate content altogether. With the example you used (different color schemes) it would be quite easy to get the GET data, set the cookie, and then redirect back to index.php – this way no duplicate content is created…

    I’m always a bit skeptical about this though – Google and other search engines seem quite sensitive. I mean, if I created a link to this site but added a random query string like ?blah=22938 then Google would see it as an entirely different page; duplicate content. There should really be a better system in place for this type of scenario.

  3. Brian Says:

    February 17th, 2009 at 4:23 pm

    This is a new standard that has been agreed on by the three major search engines (Google, Yahoo!, and Live) and was announced recently at SMX West. Live’s announcement: http://blogs.msdn.com/webmaster/archive/2009/02/12/partnering-to-help-solve-duplicate-content-issues.aspx

  4. Bold Endeavours Says:

    March 26th, 2009 at 5:14 am

    Yes it is better to avoid duplicate content and generate the unique content for the site. It will take time and money but still it is worth doing it.

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

 
connect with me!