<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" > <channel><title>Comments on: Submitting to Paid Directories&#8230; Yay or Nay?</title> <atom:link href="http://brenelz.com/blog/submitting-to-paid-directories-yay-or-nay/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://brenelz.com/blog/submitting-to-paid-directories-yay-or-nay/</link> <description>a winnipeg website design company.</description> <lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 15:07:39 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" /> <item><title>By: Keith</title><link>http://brenelz.com/blog/submitting-to-paid-directories-yay-or-nay/comment-page-1/#comment-1829</link> <dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:44:42 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brenelz.com/?p=568#comment-1829</guid> <description>I submit to some free directories if they have listing pages relevant to my website and don&#039;t appear to be &quot;bad&quot; links. I refuse to pay yahoo for anything.I was taught that content is #1 when it comes to getting links, pagerank, and SERP&#039;s. Writing content that other people want to link to is the key. The problem is in my field (fence products), nobody really links to me. So I have expanded to DIY and home improvement areas and have networked with bloggers in that area (many more options). It worked for me with my last website that I recently sold to start my new one a couple of months ago.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I submit to some free directories if they have listing pages relevant to my website and don&#8217;t appear to be &#8220;bad&#8221; links. I refuse to pay yahoo for anything.</p><p>I was taught that content is #1 when it comes to getting links, pagerank, and SERP&#8217;s. Writing content that other people want to link to is the key. The problem is in my field (fence products), nobody really links to me. So I have expanded to DIY and home improvement areas and have networked with bloggers in that area (many more options). It worked for me with my last website that I recently sold to start my new one a couple of months ago.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mergen from WEBGURU-CO.COM</title><link>http://brenelz.com/blog/submitting-to-paid-directories-yay-or-nay/comment-page-1/#comment-341</link> <dc:creator>Mergen from WEBGURU-CO.COM</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 01:44:49 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brenelz.com/?p=568#comment-341</guid> <description>I&#039;m not a big fan of paid directories.  I think similar results can be achieved without having to fork out money.DMOZ in my mind should be devalued to almost nothing.  They are a pain in the rear to work with.  Numerous attempts to get listed can simply go unnoticed without even a courtesy reply. There is no accountability there.Boon, if you take out links, how else can search engines place more weight to a site?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not a big fan of paid directories.  I think similar results can be achieved without having to fork out money.</p><p>DMOZ in my mind should be devalued to almost nothing.  They are a pain in the rear to work with.  Numerous attempts to get listed can simply go unnoticed without even a courtesy reply. There is no accountability there.</p><p>Boon, if you take out links, how else can search engines place more weight to a site?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Boon</title><link>http://brenelz.com/blog/submitting-to-paid-directories-yay-or-nay/comment-page-1/#comment-340</link> <dc:creator>Boon</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 24 Jan 2009 02:37:27 +0000</pubDate> <guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.brenelz.com/?p=568#comment-340</guid> <description>I think paying to get included into directories shows just how absurd our dependence on Google and their pagaranking algorithm is.Everyone is searching for that mythical first page, and every month that passes more and more webmasters are trying more tricks to try to boost pagerank, most likely through getting more links to their site.I think what is needed is a radical overhaul... another credible competitor to google in the search area will help, especially one who will use a different search algorithm that de-emphasizes links.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think paying to get included into directories shows just how absurd our dependence on Google and their pagaranking algorithm is.</p><p>Everyone is searching for that mythical first page, and every month that passes more and more webmasters are trying more tricks to try to boost pagerank, most likely through getting more links to their site.</p><p>I think what is needed is a radical overhaul&#8230; another credible competitor to google in the search area will help, especially one who will use a different search algorithm that de-emphasizes links.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced (User agent is rejected)
Database Caching 26/34 queries in 0.007 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 520/521 objects using disk: basic

Served from: brenelz.com @ 2012-02-09 05:25:06 -->
